More Bovine Excrement
Performance reviews are part of what Culbert calls, descriptively, “bullsh*t,” and bullsh*t, he says, “has become the etiquette of choice in corporate communications.” The standard evaluation processes, says Culbert in his book are “rife with bullsh*t, impede straight-talk and teamwork between bosses and their direct reports.”
An earlier Culbert book,
Don’t Kill the Bosses! examines why subordinates get slaughtered when bosses frequently get fat. The book, writes Culbert, “questions the practice of dismissing subordinates while allowing the bosses, who hired those subordinates and who are responsible for deploying, guiding, and overseeing them, to distance themselves from the train wrecks.”
Performance reviews, Culbert says in his
Wall Street Journal essay, “Get Rid of the Performance Review!,” inherently put the supervisor and the employee against each other, with the supervisor stressing the need for improved performance and the employee making a case for better pay and advancement. “At best,” he writes, “the discussion accomplishes nothing. More likely, it creates tensions that carry over to their everyday relationships.”
Culbert argues that the performance review is “immoral” when management erects a façade that reviews lead to corporate improvement, “when it’s clear they lead to more bogus activities than valid ones. Instead of energizing individuals, they are dispiriting and create cynicism.”
What should a worker do after receiving a bad evaluation? In a podcast, Culbert says, “Arguing won’t get you anywhere.” If you balk and argue, the review “becomes a political event,” which won’t work for the employee. The employee, he says, “needs to get back to the boss now that all the lights on stage are off” and communicate fully. The key question is, “Can you enlist the boss as your teammate?” If that doesn’t work, “The background music is ‘Hit the Road, Jack.’ It’s time to look for a transfer elsewhere in the company or a new job somewhere else.”
Review This Idea
Now that you’ve heard Culbert’s perspective, what do you think of it as a manager? As an employee? Let the
MANAGING POWER community know: Share your experience and advice by using the Comments button at the bottom of this story.
—Kennedy Maize is executive editor for MANAGING POWER.
Scrap the qualitative crap and concentrate on the important that can be fairly “kicked-and-counted”. Those who help meet the target get rewarded in proportion to their efforts. Those who do not help much do not get much. Those who do not help are replaced.
Additonaly, the evaluation must include some form of two way communication - not an employee taking criticism.
The best manager will monitor performance continuosly, and provide appropriate guidance as needed. As for adjustment of compensation, that should be negotiated on a case by case basis. The hard working agressive employee will naturally earn more whereas the passive lower performer will settle for less.